I haven't made a post in a long while, but using verbal muscles is probably a good thing, generally speaking, my working for the English-teaching, verbal-muscle organization and all. I shouldn't talk about the classes I'm teaching because even though Xanga is pretty much web roadkill, sure enough someone will find out and trouble will start to spill like some bubbling, greenish acid pouring out of a toxic-waste drum. The metaphors are coming fairly quickly, so there's that confirmation of my not having formed sentences lately, meaning of course written ones, written ones!, not the the extemporaneous mouthfuls of air I emit all day, everyday. Here's the thing. I am teaching a sophomore-level section of Christianity and Literature, our first ever. I had some meteorite problems at the start of this semester, too (a reference to the "Panic in the Sky" post from September), which I was able to get through, thankfully, and so I felt that this class, like my others, needed on Wednesday and Thursday my renewed and diligent attention, preparation-wise.
Yesterday, we were covering the middle third of The Screwtape Letters, a popular book of Christian humor by a writer named C.S. Lewis, who lived in a time called the twentieth century and published many books that many people are aware of and even admire and respect and, amazingly, read. On Tuesday we covered the first ten letters in somewhat rote fashion. I didn't like how mechanical and dull class was, though some goodish content got put out on the table, so I wanted to come up with a new approach for letters 11-20, which I did and which I was enthusiastic about, a tack I called "How to Read a Screwtape Letter," and which consisted of my pointing out that each letter probably offered a) a main teaching point along with some subsidiary insights and truths, b) a telling example, and c) a few forcefully phrased sentences to drive the point home. I then used letter 21 to illustrate these three elements and asked the class for examples of a, b, and c from the letters assigned for that day.
I let my enthusiasm for the approach and the material show, I think--I remember getting pretty animated--and I got some comments out of them, and we made it through class covering the letters assigned for that day, though it still seemed mostly dull and sluggish. Six out of seventeen people cut class, and of the eleven there only about four were actively attentive. All my enthusiasm and chalk-board writing did not get others to join that circle of higher concentration. The rest were just superficially attentive--they were mostly listening and sometimes responding verbally, but if I had wiped clean the boards at the end of class and had them, using book and notes, write down examples of a's, b's, and c's from our discussion, I doubt that they could have come up with much of what we had just that very period covered. I could be wrong and hope I'm wrong, but they mostly seem to be coming to class casually, like it's a kind of neighborhood reading/chat group, not an activity with content that they are responsible to show they've mastered. So I have to respond somehow to that casualness. Which is okay. I can do that. But it makes you not want to let your enthusiasm show in front of that many unengaged people.
Chatboard (4)