Weblog

Friday, 13 February 2009

  • I haven't made a post in a long while, but using verbal muscles is probably a good thing, generally speaking, my working for the English-teaching, verbal-muscle organization and all. I shouldn't talk about the classes I'm teaching because even though Xanga is pretty much web roadkill, sure enough someone will find out and trouble will start to spill like some bubbling, greenish acid pouring out of a toxic-waste drum. The metaphors are coming fairly quickly, so there's that confirmation of my not having formed sentences lately, meaning of course written ones, written ones!, not the the extemporaneous mouthfuls of air I emit all day, everyday. Here's the thing. I am teaching a sophomore-level section of Christianity and Literature, our first ever. I had some meteorite problems at the start of this semester, too (a reference to the "Panic in the Sky" post from September), which I was able to get through, thankfully, and so I felt that this class, like my others, needed on Wednesday and Thursday my renewed and diligent attention, preparation-wise.

    Yesterday, we were covering the middle third of The Screwtape Letters, a popular book of Christian humor by a writer named C.S. Lewis, who lived in a time called the twentieth century and published many books that many people are aware of and even admire and respect and, amazingly, read. On Tuesday we covered the first ten letters in somewhat rote fashion. I didn't like how mechanical and dull class was, though some goodish content got put out on the table, so I wanted to come up with a new approach for letters 11-20, which I did and which I was enthusiastic about, a tack I called "How to Read a Screwtape Letter," and which consisted of my pointing out that each letter probably offered a) a main teaching point along with some subsidiary insights and truths, b) a telling example, and c) a few forcefully phrased sentences to drive the point home. I then used letter 21 to illustrate these three elements and asked the class for examples of a, b, and c from the letters assigned for that day.

    I let my enthusiasm for the approach and the material show, I think--I remember getting pretty animated--and I got some comments out of them, and we made it through class covering the letters assigned for that day, though it still seemed mostly dull and sluggish. Six out of seventeen people cut class, and of the eleven there only about four were actively attentive. All my enthusiasm and chalk-board writing did not get others to join that circle of higher concentration. The rest were just superficially attentive--they were mostly listening and sometimes responding verbally, but if I had wiped clean the boards at the end of class and had them, using book and notes, write down examples of a's, b's, and c's from our discussion, I doubt that they could have come up with much of what we had just that very period covered. I could be wrong and hope I'm wrong, but they mostly seem to be coming to class casually, like it's a kind of neighborhood reading/chat group, not an activity with content that they are responsible to show they've mastered. So I have to respond somehow to that casualness. Which is okay. I can do that. But it makes you not want to let your enthusiasm show in front of that many unengaged people.

Sunday, 04 January 2009

  • On Sunday, January 7, 2007, I went to church with my parents here in St. Louis to hear the new pastor of their church preach his first sermon there. I even made an entry here about it, saying that it was "a longish sermon." Well, now it's two years later, the same guy is still manning the pulpit, and I went with my parents to hear him today. The church service began at 10:15. It ended a minute or two short of noon. The pastor started preaching at 10:50. He is beginning a study of the letter to the Romans, and today he covered the first six verses. He ended his sermon at 11:52. The sermon was the longest I have ever heard--sixty-two minutes on six introductory verses. I took a peek at the rest of the congregation at about the forty-minute mark when we were just about reaching the backstretch, and it didn't look as if they were exactly riveted by his efforts. But how spellbinding would a sermon of that length have to be to hold hundreds of people's attention? Bored looks aplenty. Three people got up at various times and left--going out the back doors to the parking lot, not out the side doors to a bathroom. The pastor had some good points--about fifteen minutes of good content buried away in the bloat. Of course, a short sermon can be boring just as an incredibly long one can, but after today it sure seems that the long ones have some built-in challenges of avoiding boredom than the short ones lack.

    It made me think that maybe there should be some quality control on preachers, besides the obvious one of people leaving the church for other churches (which is what's also happening here; the church has downsized by about a third in two years). Teachers have their student evaluations, schools and hospitals their accreditation boards, other professions have supervisory assessments. Do pastors feel themselves above such assessment by the people paying their salaries? Do they feel that they report only to God? Any why wouldn't God want them to be cogent? When someone at this church mentions that the sermons could be a bit more distilled in their wisdom, the pastor just shrugs off the comment under the reply that he is called to the ministry by God, which evidently excuses these meandering, self-indulgent, anecdote-filled spiels (for example, ten minutes today on NASCAR, a sport that he finds entertaining but that his wife describes as "three hours of making a left turn").

    What's worse is that he can look around the room and see the same inattentiveness that I saw but is apparently not bothered by it. Bored people in the pews he evidently blames on the bored people, rather than seeing glazed faces as a challenge to himself to make his comments more absorbing. Everyone who speaks to rooms of people for a living has bored some of the people some of the time, myself included. The best comment I heard at an in-service over the past two or three years was the observation that when a teacher looks out over the class and sees signs of boredom, before blaming the students, the teacher should first ask what he/she is doing to make the material interesting and do more.

    And then of course, there's P.G. Wodehouse's classic short story "The Great Sermon Handicap." I thought of that today. Bertie Wooster hears from two cousins about a sure-fire way to make some money: come to the country where his two relatives have set up a weekly betting pool based on the length of the local preachers' sermons. They are handicapping the local parsons and setting the odds. Bertie knows of a chap who has a sermon on brotherly love that lasts forty-five minutes if it lasts a second. He thinks he has a sure winner. But I know someone who could beat that.

Saturday, 22 November 2008

  • This will seem boring, prolly. I have been wanting to get a haircut ever since I saw that Rodney got a haircut a while ago. Kind of a monkey-haircut-see, monkey-haircut-do situation, except that I didn't do it, and last week I saw that Rodney now has a new haircut. A whole Rodney-hair-cycle had passed with me just getting scruffier and seedier. No one ever tells me that I should get a haircut, so I assume that no one really expects me to look what could be called "good," but still, even I hate to look obviously bad ALL of the time. So Haircut 2 for Rodney guilted me into going to Pro-Cuts, where Melanie waited this morning at 9:15.

    While she was snipping, Melanie told me that I should consider a rinse. I needed clarification. She told me that I could go to Wal-Mart and obtain a rinse that would blend the gray I have with a non-dark color (like blondish) so that it wouldn't look like an obvious attempt to hide gray but more like an even blending kind of thing. I kind of liked that. It's like you're vain and want to hide the gray but not blatantly vain, so you're letting a lot hang around. She said that a rinse is put on after shampoo and can be washed out right away if you don't like it. So I thought this might be a good weekend experiment. A trial rinse to see a new me. Not that I'm vain. Or at least not blatantly. It was all Melanie.

    But evidently Wal-Mart has gotten out of the rinse business. I spoke with a person in the appropriate section of the store--no rinses at all, only more permanant colors, which take weeks to come out and which I don't want to mess with. I don't really think that I would have shown up anywhere outside my home with a blond-gray rinse, but it might have been interesting to see what I looked like.

Friday, 14 November 2008

  • Here's what I did, prank-wise, referred to below:

    1) In grad school, I had an apartment right below a sports anchor who listened to games with the volume turned way up. I could hear every word of the announcers coming through the ceiling. After weeks of this, I finally went out to the mailboxes and got him name, then looked him up in the phone book. One Saturday when he had the volume up way, way high, I called him. I could hear the phone ringing upstairs through the ceiling. I could hear him walking over to turn down the radio. I could hear him walking over to the phone. Right when he got to the phone, I hung up. Silence. He was thinking. Then up comes the game broadcast again loud. I waited a minute. I called again. The sound of steps over to the receiver. Volume down. The sound of steps over to the phone. I hung up. Long silence. Then he makes a call. I hear him say, "Hey, did you just call me?" He talks for a while. Then he turns the volume up but not so loud. (This may have included a third call before he started calling others.)

    2) At Howard Payne, we had at one time a Packer Hall person who monitored syllabi for correctness and conformity to accreditation policies. This person was a bit fond of asserting authority in a heavy-handedish way. To violate the syllabus code brought a stern demerit. One of the faculty had "crossed swords," so to speak, with this syllabus cop on occasion. One day, I was coming in the building, and I saw in everyone's mailbox copies of a note sent to the whole campus from the gestapo of the syllabus announcing an upcoming meeting on proper syllabus form and design. I took out the copy in the box of the other teacher who had voiced displeasure with this person and wrote at the bottom in my best imitation of Packer Hall cursive: "Make plans to attend" followed by the initials of the syllabus enforcer. Having stirred the pot, I then went upstairs, where a student waited for advising. About five minutes later, the teacher with the personalized note came angrily into my office. "Did you get one of these?" "Well, I'm advising someone right now. Just wait a minute." "Look what's written at the bottom. Look at that note. Did you get one of those?" "No, I just have the memo. Can you wait a minute?" "That's what I thought." Off the person went. A few minutes later, there was a return with a newly written letter to higher administrators complaining in blunt language over the snub. "Don't send that," I said. "Just give me a minute to finish talking to Alan here." "No, I'm going to send it." "Wait. Wait. I wrote that note at the bottom." Long pause. Long, long pause. "You got me good."

    And since then, I've been really well behaved.

Wednesday, 12 November 2008

  • Yesterday I was talking to another teacher who told me that the upper-level students that he/she has are very frank and open with their in-class comments. "Yeah," one of them said in the course of some literature-related discussion, "Christians can act really shitty sometimes." And another chimed in, "When they get real judgmental, it really pisses me off." New color for my paintbox. What must that be like? My students do everything but wear white gloves to class. In my upper-level class on Monday, we were reading a short story ("Roman Fever" by Edith Wharton) about the meanness that resides below the surface of the false politeness of two "friends." I asked the students for examples of people being mean to people. No answers. So I offered up two little mildly mean-ish practical jokes I did years ago. Mouths fall open. "I can't believe you did that!" I felt very properly chastised. Obligatory hanging of the head.

    How would that other class have responded? "Way to go!" "We all need to let off steam every once in a while!" "I bet it's liberating to do something like that." Well, sure.

HPUPHD

  • Visit HPUPHD's Xanga Site
    • Name: HPUPHD
    • Member Since: 9/14/2004

About Me

[no info]

Pulse

Chatboard (4)

  • Krissy_Cole
    Ask and ye shall receive...
  • rocketRefund
    This is where everyone can converse in close to real time... If you have a lot of readers that just like to hang around on your site waiting for someone to say something.I'm not sure that I like the chat board.
  • HPUPHD
    i still don't know
    • Posted 4/30/2007 5:37 PM
    • by HPUPHD
  • HPUPHD
    How is my chatboard different than my blog?
    • Posted 4/27/2006 10:02 AM
    • by HPUPHD